Skip to content

Reducing the Total Cost of Ownership of the Engineering Platform

This page describes the strategic business scenario Reducing the Total Cost of Ownership of the Engineering Platform from a user perspective: which problem the organization is solving, which roles are usually involved, and how to organize the process in GitFlic so the scenario works in practice.

This material is useful when you need to discuss the Reducing the Total Cost of Ownership of the Engineering Platform scenario not at the level of a feature checklist, but at the level of an organizational challenge: who owns the process, which decisions must be formalized, and by which signs you can tell that implementation is moving in the right direction.

What the scenario is about

This scenario should be read not as a description of a single GitFlic feature, but as a description of a target process at the organizational level. What matters here are the rules, roles/positions, control points, and sequence of actions that together make the work stable and reproducible.

This is not TCO in the narrow procurement sense, but a reduction of the total burden of supporting the toolchain, integrations, process standardization, user support, and project maintenance. The scenario fits especially well at the CIO/CTO level.

When the scenario becomes relevant

Below are typical signs that show the scenario has already become a practical task for the organization, rather than just a promising idea for the future. - the organization’s costs for supporting the toolchain and integrations are growing - cost of ownership is determined not only by licenses, but also by team effort - a more transparent and manageable engineering environment is required

Who this scenario is useful for

Linking the scenario to roles and positions helps ensure that it has clear process owners, change participants, and operational executors.

The scenario should be considered through the roles and positions that are responsible for the result, define the process rules, or work inside the process every day. - Primarily useful for the role/position: Chief Information Officer (CIO) - Also often useful for: Head of Operations and Support, Director of Application Development - At the operational level, especially useful for: System Administrator, Platform Engineer / DevOps, Systems Architect

What needs to be organized in the process

This section lists not isolated features, but elements of the target process. These are the elements that usually need to be formalized through rules, templates, responsibility, and repeatable actions in GitFlic. - calculate TCO not only for the product, but also for integrations, support, training, and manual operations - reduce the number of systems and support points - scale the platform without proportional growth of the operations team

How GitFlic helps organize the process

In this scenario, GitFlic helps not through a single setting, but through a combination of platform capabilities: repositories, merge requests, roles, checks, pipelines, artifacts, logging, and operational procedures. - GitFlic helps reduce the overall burden of supporting the engineering platform. - This is achieved through consolidation, standardization, and fewer manual operations. - For users, this appears as a simpler and more stable operating environment.

What results the organization gets

The outcome should be evaluated not only by the convenience for one participant, but also by how much the scenario reduces chaos, manual work, coordination losses, and dependency on local knowledge.

This scenario helps lower the real cost of running the engineering platform, not only through licensing, but through lower complexity. - The cost of supporting integrations, manual operations, and fragmented tools decreases. - It becomes easier to scale the platform without proportional growth of the operations team. - A more transparent ownership model for the engineering environment and its evolution appears.

Where to start

A practical start is best done through a limited pilot: that makes it easier to validate which rules and settings already work and which still need to be adapted to your environment.

  1. Identify exactly where the process is breaking today: at the MR stage, in checks, artifacts, access, audit, or operations.
  2. Define the minimum mandatory rules for this scenario: who is responsible, which checks are required, and what counts as a completed result.
  3. Launch a pilot with a limited number of projects or teams and measure the effect in time, quality, and the number of manual operations.
  4. After the pilot, formalize the rules as a reproducible practice rather than a local agreement used by a single team.

Practical guidance

  • Scenario priority: High
  • License level: Free
  • Practical meaning: In practice, this scenario usually starts from a baseline environment or a pilot.